composer/doc/02-libraries.md

# Libraries

This chapter will tell you how to make your library installable through composer.

## Every project is a package

As soon as you have a `composer.json` in a directory, that directory is a
package. When you add a `require` to a project, you are making a package that
depends on other packages. The only difference between your project and
libraries is that your project is a package without a name.

In order to make that package installable you need to give it a name. You do
this by adding a `name` to `composer.json`:

    {
        "name": "acme/hello-world",
        "require": {
            "monolog/monolog": "1.0.*"
        }
    }

In this case the project name is `acme/hello-world`, where `acme` is the
vendor name. Supplying a vendor name is mandatory.

> **Note:** If you don't know what to use as a vendor name, your GitHub
username is usually a good bet. While package names are case insensitive, the
convention is all lowercase and dashes for word separation.

## Specifying the version

You need to specify the package's version some way. When you publish your
package on Packagist, it is able to infer the version from the VCS (git, svn,
hg) information, so in that case you do not have to specify it, and it is
recommended not to. See [tags](#tags) and [branches](#branches) to see how
version numbers are extracted from these.

If you are creating packages by hand and really have to specify it explicitly,
you can just add a `version` field:

    {
        "version": "1.0.0"
    }

### Tags

For every tag that looks like a version, a package version of that tag will be
created. It should match 'X.Y.Z' or 'vX.Y.Z', with an optional suffix for RC,
beta, alpha or patch.

Here are a few examples of valid tag names:

    1.0.0
    v1.0.0
    1.10.5-RC1
    v4.4.4beta2
    v2.0.0-alpha
    v2.0.4-p1

> **Note:** If you specify an explicit version in `composer.json`, the tag name must match the specified version.

### Branches

For every branch, a package development version will be created. If the branch
name looks like a version, the version will be `{branchname}-dev`. For example
a branch `2.0` will get a version `2.0.x-dev` (the `.x` is added for technical
reasons, to make sure it is recognized as a branch, a `2.0.x` branch would also
be valid and be turned into `2.0.x-dev` as well. If the branch does not look
like a version, it will be `dev-{branchname}`. `master` results in a
`dev-master` version.

Here are some examples of version branch names:

    1.x
    1.0 (equals 1.0.x)
    1.1.x

> **Note:** When you install a dev version, it will install it from source.

### Aliases

It is possible alias branch names to versions. For example, you could alias
`dev-master` to `1.0.x-dev`, which would allow you to require `1.0.x-dev` in all
the packages.

See [Aliases](articles/aliases.md) for more information.

## Lock file

For your library you may commit the `composer.lock` file if you want to. This
can help your team to always test against the same dependency versions.
However, this lock file will not have any effect on other projects that depend
on it. It only has an effect on the main project.

If you do not want to commit the lock file and you are using git, add it to
the `.gitignore`.

## Light-weight distribution packages

Including the tests and other useless information like .travis.yml in
distributed packages is not a good idea.

The `.gitattributes` file is a git specific file like `.gitignore` also living
at the root directory of your library. It overrides local and global
configuration (`.git/config` and `~/.gitconfig` respectively) when present and
tracked by git.

Use `.gitattributes` to prevent unwanted files from bloating the zip
distribution packages.

    // .gitattributes
    Tests/ export-ignore
    phpunit.xml.dist export-ignore
    Resources/doc/ export-ignore
    .travis.yml export-ignore

Test it by inspecting the zip file generated manually:

    git archive branchName --format zip -o file.zip

> **Note:** Files would be still tracked by git just not included in the
> distribution. This will only work for GitHub packages installed from
> dist (i.e. tagged releases) for now.

## Publishing to a VCS

Once you have a vcs repository (version control system, e.g. git) containing a
`composer.json` file, your library is already composer-installable. In this
example we will publish the `acme/hello-world` library on GitHub under
`github.com/composer/hello-world`.

Now, To test installing the `acme/hello-world` package, we create a new
project locally. We will call it `acme/blog`. This blog will depend on
`acme/hello-world`, which in turn depends on `monolog/monolog`. We can
accomplish this by creating a new `blog` directory somewhere, containing a
`composer.json`:

    {
        "name": "acme/blog",
        "require": {
            "acme/hello-world": "dev-master"
        }
    }

The name is not needed in this case, since we don't want to publish the blog
as a library. It is added here to clarify which `composer.json` is being
described.

Now we need to tell the blog app where to find the `hello-world` dependency.
We do this by adding a package repository specification to the blog's
`composer.json`:

    {
        "name": "acme/blog",
        "repositories": [
            {
                "type": "vcs",
                "url": "https://github.com/composer/hello-world"
            }
        ],
        "require": {
            "acme/hello-world": "dev-master"
        }
    }

For more details on how package repositories work and what other types are
available, see [Repositories](05-repositories.md).

That's all. You can now install the dependencies by running composer's
`install` command!

**Recap:** Any git/svn/hg repository containing a `composer.json` can be added
to your project by specifying the package repository and declaring the
dependency in the `require` field.

## Publishing to packagist

Alright, so now you can publish packages. But specifying the vcs repository
every time is cumbersome. You don't want to force all your users to do that.

The other thing that you may have noticed is that we did not specify a package
repository for `monolog/monolog`. How did that work? The answer is packagist.

[Packagist](http://packagist.org/) is the main package repository for
composer, and it is enabled by default. Anything that is published on
packagist is available automatically through composer. Since monolog
[is on packagist](http://packagist.org/packages/monolog/monolog), we can depend
on it without having to specify any additional repositories.

If we wanted to share `hello-world` with the world, we would publish it on
packagist as well. Doing so is really easy.

You simply hit the big "Submit Package" button and sign up. Then you submit
the URL to your VCS repository, at which point packagist will start crawling
it. Once it is done, your package will be available to anyone.

← [Basic usage](01-basic-usage.md) |  [Command-line interface](03-cli.md) →