Correction of SPDX license identifier examples
The more common LGPL version number is 2.1 not 2.0, this is a minor mistake I made and should be corrected now.pull/1011/head
parent
7b3ce479cd
commit
e3cbe3fb1e
|
@ -140,8 +140,8 @@ The recommended notation for the most common licenses is (alphabetical):
|
||||||
GPL-2.0+
|
GPL-2.0+
|
||||||
GPL-3.0
|
GPL-3.0
|
||||||
GPL-3.0+
|
GPL-3.0+
|
||||||
LGPL-2.0
|
LGPL-2.1
|
||||||
LGPL-2.0+
|
LGPL-2.1+
|
||||||
LGPL-3.0
|
LGPL-3.0
|
||||||
LGPL-3.0+
|
LGPL-3.0+
|
||||||
MIT
|
MIT
|
||||||
|
@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ An Example for disjunctive licenses:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
"license": [
|
"license": [
|
||||||
"LGPL-2.0",
|
"LGPL-2.1",
|
||||||
"GPL-3.0+"
|
"GPL-3.0+"
|
||||||
]
|
]
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ An Example for disjunctive licenses:
|
||||||
Alternatively they can be separated with "or" and enclosed in parenthesis;
|
Alternatively they can be separated with "or" and enclosed in parenthesis;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
"license": "(LGPL-2.0 or GPL-3.0+)"
|
"license": "(LGPL-2.1 or GPL-3.0+)"
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Similarly when multiple licenses need to be applied ("conjunctive license"),
|
Similarly when multiple licenses need to be applied ("conjunctive license"),
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue