Add FAQ entry

doc/faqs/why-are-version-constraints-combining-comparisons-and-wildcards-a-bad-idea.md

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+# Why are version constraints combining comparisons and wildcards a bad idea?
+
+This is a fairly common mistake people make, defining version constraints in
+their package requires like `>=2.*` or `>=1.1.*`.
+
+If you think about it and what it really means though, you will quickly
+realize that it does not make much sense. If we decompose `>=2.*`, you
+have two parts:
+
+- `>=2` which says the package should be in version 2.0.0 or above.
+- `2.*` which says the package should be between version 2.0.0 (inclusive)
+  and 3.0.0 (exclusive).
+
+As you see, both rules agree on the fact that the package must be >=2.0.0,
+but it is not possible to determine if when you wrote that you were thinking
+of a package in version 3.0.0 or not. Should it match because you asked for
+`>=2` or should it not match because you asked for a `2.*`?
+
+For this reason, Composer just throws an error and says that this is invalid.
+The easy way to fix it is to think about what you really mean, and use only
+one of those rules.